"Modern Orthodox Thinkers" by Andrew Louth. A Review
Modern Orthodox Thinkers: From the Philokalia to the Present
Andrew Louth
IVP Academic (InterVarsity Press)
PO Box 1400
Downers Grove, IL 60515
ISBN: 978-0-8308-5121-8; $35.00; September
2015
Reviewed by Rev. Dr. Michael Philliber for
Deus Misereatur
Insightful; 5
Stars out of 5
For one who hardly
knows the difference between an archimandrite and an apolytikion,
or a hatjis and a heretismoi, it’s a bit of a stretch to
pick up and stay with the 416 page paperback “Modern Orthodox Thinkers: From
the Philokalia to the Present”. Yet
Andrew Louth, who serves as a priest in the Russian Orthodox parish in Durham
and is professor emeritus of patristic and Byzantine studies at Durham
University, England, as well as a visiting professor of Eastern Orthodox
theology at the Amsterdam Centre of Eastern Orthodox Theology in the Faculty of
Theology, the Free University, Amsterdam, has made what at first appears
insurmountable into something obtainable.
This scholarly tome leads an interested reader through the development
of a particular stream of Eastern Orthodox thought that winds its way from
Mount Athos, to Russia, on to Paris, over into Greece, across to America and to
finally settle in England. For the non-Orthodox, it is an unfamiliar world with
its own language and choreography, but it’s an intriguing world.
The premise of “Modern Orthodox Thinkers” is stated squarely
in the subtitle, “From the Philokalia
to the Present”. The Philokalia was
compiled in the eighteenth century by two Orthodox monks, St. Nikodimos of the
Holy Mountain and St. Makarias of Corinth, on Mount Athos as an instructive
guide for other monks. The work collected texts written by earlier Christian pastors,
monks, theologians and spiritual guides as part of a renewal movement within
the Orthodox Church that sought to restore the tradition of Byzantine
monasticism, return to the Fathers, reestablish the importance of a
monasticism that focused on prayer, especially the Jesus Prayer, and restore the
role of spiritual fatherhood (9). Though the multi-volume work of the Philokalia was meant for monastic
renewal, once it was published and began to be read by a larger Orthodox
audience, it became part of a watershed moment in the history of Orthodox
theology (10). “The Philokalic movement provided a powerful resource for such
return to Orthodox principles, as it had at its heart a programme for a renewed
personal spirituality, based on the Jesus Prayer, and an emphasis on the
importance of…spiritual eldership that, at its best, made sure that the
spiritual revival remained sound and healthy” (11).
The author weaves
and walks his way through numerous Orthodox examples, most of whom were not
theologically trained, and many who were not ordained clergy. Louth largely
focuses “on the presence of Orthodoxy in the West, and especially the influence
of the Russians who found themselves in Paris after their expulsion from Russia
in 1922” (282). He follows the trail which “blossomed in the Russian Religious
Renaissance” and found its way into Greece and beyond, because he sees this
renewal, that was marked out by the publication of the Philokalia, as representing “all that is best in Orthodox theology
over the last two centuries” (333).
“Modern Orthodox
Thinkers” snakes its way through the life stories of a crowd of people. The
Author begins with Solov’ev and ends with Metropolitan Kallistos, bringing
along a troop of others such as Florensky, Bulgakov, Berdyaev, Florovsky,
Mother Maria, Staniloae, Popovic, Evdokimov, Meyendorff, Schmemann, Vasileios,
Zizioulas, Romanides, Sherrard, Koutroubis, Yannaras, Ramfos, Behr-Sigel,
Clement, Mother Thekla, Silouan, Sophrony, and Men’. Each chapter gives just
enough biographical data to help the reader feel informed about the particular
person being discussed, and then the sample aspects of how the Philokalia worked into and out of that
persons experience are graciously opened up and worked through. It appears to
me that the author is fair in his approach and judicious in his analysis. Some
of the subjects that are covered with quite a bit of regularity are Sophiology,
apophatic theology over and above the kataphatic, starets and the starchestvo,
the Jesus Prayer, Gregory Palamis, palamism
and neo-palamism, theosis, and monasticism. But always the
distinctive thread sown into the fabric of this book is the Philokalia and that “theology is not
concerned with concepts, though it makes use of them, but concerned with
engagement with God” (138).
Louth is skillful
in translating concepts and ideas that may be foreign to the non-Orthodox
reader, while keeping the flow of the book from stalling. Not only was “Modern
Orthodox Thinkers” helpful to me in pointing out some of the unique ways Orthodoxy
views the Christian faith, but it also pulled together the historical
developments of the Orthodox Church in
America and gave me a richer understanding of several of the Orthodox
writers I have read in the past. I’m certain that many Orthodox readers will
find the book a worthwhile read, and for American Protestants, this book may
well give you better insight as to why Orthodoxy is finding a foothold in North
America. Though I personally and confessionally don’t agree with all of the
theological conclusions of the book, nevertheless I highly recommend it.
Thanks to IVP
Academic for the free copy of “Modern Orthodox Thinkers” used for this review.
Comments