"Myths and Mistakes in New Testament Textual Criticism: ed. by Hixson and Gurry. A Review
Myths and Mistakes in New Testament
Textual Criticism
Elijah Hixson and Peter J. Gurry,
editors
IVP Academic
Ivpress.com
ISBN: 978-0-8308-5257-4; November 2019;
$40.00
It could
be a sign that I have crossed the threshold into the bleary realm of being eccentric
and idiosyncratic. Honestly, I wholly expected to be bored to tears. But
somehow reading about ancient manuscripts of the New Testament, codices,
fragments and variants was enjoyable! Editors Elijah Hixson, junior research
associate in New Testament Text and Language at Tyndale House, Cambridge, and
Peter J. Gurry, assistant professor of New Testament and codirector of the Text
and Canon Institute at Phoenix Seminary, have enlisted a team of knowledgeable and
engaging authors in their new 400-page paperback, “Myths and Mistakes in New
Testament Textual Criticism.” Not written for technicians, but rather for pastors,
apologists, seminarians, and congregants, this volume intelligibly hits the
mark.
The editors
and contributors seek to accomplish several things. They address grandiose
claims about the New Testament manuscripts from both friends and foes. The essayists
show, whenever they can, where friend and foe are correct, and clearly where
they are wrong. Further, the writers walk their readers through the ancient manuscripts
of the New Testament, explaining what the variations are across textual “families,”
how these affect our understanding of the diffusion of early New Testament
documents, why they matter, and how they broadcast to us – against the claims
of some – a strong textual stability and reliability. Though addressing and
answering the claims and assertions of Bart Ehrman and Kurt Eichenwald is not
the primary task of the volume, the authors do engage with them at important
places.
I found
the book helpful at numerous places and learned better ways of understanding
how we came to have our New Testament Scriptures today. I also walked away with
an even greater assurance at the reliability and stability of our New Testament,
especially in the face of elaborate and alarming claims floating in popular culture.
In several places I learned new factors I had never known before, such as the early
practice of scribes abbreviating important names as they copied manuscripts,
commonly called nomina sacra. Or, how the copyists who transcribed the
New Testament evidenced in their copies some clear skills at transcribing, but
also various aspects of quality assurance, so that “among the early manuscripts
we find a wide range of skills and abilities, but still a significant majority
(of copyists) appear to be competent transcribers” (142). This volume was
filled with a trove of valuable explanations and research!
Hixson
and Gurry should be applauded for, both, pulling together a sharp crew of
contributors, and for having this topic covered so well. “Myths and Mistakes in
New Testament Textual Criticism” is a keeper! This is a volume you will want on
your shelf to refer to time and again. It would make a super gift for your
pastor, Bible Class teacher, or favorite seminarian this holiday season.
Without hesitation, I strongly recommend the book.
I am
ever grateful that IVP Academic answered my request for a copy of this book
used in the above analysis. And I’m thankful that all they asked of me was an
honest review. Consequently, my evaluation is freely made and freely given.
The book may be obtained here: Myths and Mistakes
Comments